Editorial Standards

Skip to content
Search this site

Editorial Standards

Editorial Standards

These are the standards by which Learning Bridge writes, corrects and withdraws articles. We publish them so that readers can hold us to them.

1. Sources are traced back to whoever published them

Rules, calendars and statistics are written only after checking the original document from the body that issued it. Our main sources are the Ministry of Education, the Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE), the Korean Council for University Education, metropolitan and provincial offices of education, the Ministry of Personnel Management, individual local governments and the Korea Student Aid Foundation. We do not carry figures across on the strength of another outlet's reporting alone.

2. The reference date is always stated

Admissions and recruitment rules in Korea change from school year to school year. Every explanation of a rule therefore states which school year or which calendar year it refers to. Articles whose reference year has passed are updated, or — where updating is not possible — marked at the top as describing a previous standard.

3. Settled facts and expectations are kept apart

What has been confirmed and formally announced is distinguished, at the level of the individual sentence, from what is still under discussion or merely expected. We do not blur words such as "planned", "under discussion" and "confirmed".

4. Advertising is separated from content

This site displays advertising through Google AdSense and other third-party ad networks, and is funded by that revenue. Ads are served automatically, and advertisers have no involvement in the choice of topics or in what an article says. If any article were written in return for payment from a particular company, that would be stated at the top of the article. There is currently no such paid content.

5. We do not hand out rankings and recommendations freely

We do not believe we have grounds to judge one academy, instructor or textbook better than another, so we do not manufacture arbitrary "top ten" lists. We set out the criteria you need in order to compare, and leave the final choice to the reader.

6. We do not invent reviews or ratings

Unless actual data has been collected, we do not fabricate user reviews, star ratings or success stories.

7. Corrections

When we find a factual error, we handle it as follows.

  • Simple typos and formatting errors: corrected immediately, without a separate note.
  • Errors that change the meaning, such as wrong figures or a misstated rule: the text is corrected and the date and substance of the correction are recorded at the foot of the article.
  • Where the premise of the whole article is wrong: the article is withdrawn and that fact is stated.

Correction requests can be sent through the contact page.

8. This is not medical, legal or financial advice

Articles about child development are provided for general information and do not replace diagnosis or treatment. If you are worried about your child's development, please consult a paediatrician, a development centre or a local childcare support centre. Articles about education costs and scholarships are likewise not advice on your personal finances; actual eligibility must be checked against each institution's own announcement.

9. We do not handle personal data in articles

When we describe a case sent in by a reader, identifying details are removed. We do not publish an individual student's grades, school name or contact details.

10. We separate what we lived from what we checked

The editor sends two children to an English-language kindergarten and an international school abroad, and previously spent more than ten years at an online education company. That experience is used to decide what is worth covering; it does not stand in for facts.

  • Rules, figures and calendars are written from the original documents of the issuing body.
  • First-hand experience is marked separately as an "editor's note" and identified as a personal case.
  • We do not build general recommendations out of that experience, because the sample is one.

11. How bylines work

The author names on this site may be pen names or pseudonyms used to distinguish subject areas. An author description indicates the field a person covers; it does not imply any degree, certification, teaching career or counselling qualification that is not explicitly stated. All information is written with priority given to official material from public bodies and educational institutions.

The editors for each field are listed on the editor and contributors page.


Effective 27 July 2026 · These standards may be revised; any revision will be reflected on this page.